The New Alert Procedure: District 23 Guidelines
The Alert Procedure has undergone several changes. Those who have instituted
these changes believe that the players will find them very user friendly. I
heartily agree. Keep in mind that
the spirit of the Procedure remains to keep the opponents fully informed.
The changes become effective June 17, 1996. Some clubs are permitting
players to make the changes immediately to gain familiarity with them. This
is acceptable.
One of the most important things for us to understand is that many
semi-regular players are not going to be familiar with these changes for a
short period of time. If you are up to speed, because you have read the
Bulletin articles, don't make the assumption that everyone else has. Some may
have read the material but don't fully understand it yet.
Our District has allowed for a six month grace period and we expect all to
cooperate. During this period those still using the old methods will be
gently pushed into making the few adjustments to the new procedures.
This is a list of things we don't want to happen:
- A player alerts a negative double and someone jumps down his throat saying
"that's not alertable anymore!" It is just as easy to say "were you aware
that is not alertable now?" This will leave a much better taste in their
mouth. There is no need to impress people with how much you know!
- Partner overcalls and RHO doubles. LHO alerts. You have a normal raise
but pass. Later on you "discover" that the double was negative and you
complain about your result because with the alert you thought it was a
penalty double. You surely would have raised if you thought it was negative.
forget it! During this six month period players are expected to protect
themselves at all times.
It should be noted that in this auction a penalty double is
alerted as well as some non-penalty doubles. Once again, it is best to ask.
In other words, if your opponents make a procedural error with the new
methods, you will still be expected to ask questions just to be certain of
what is happening. It can never be wrong to say "Please explain". If the
opponents are on different wavelengths the director can easily protect you
from anything that goes wrong. They will not protect you when you "hoped"
the opponents were having an accident and they merely made a procedural
error.
- All players playing a very weak NT should know by now that
they must announce their methods.
Players using any aggressive method such as 10-12 No Trump, very light
opening bids or dual range No Trump structure are still expected to pre-alert
when they sit down. With the new methods, they will announce the range as the
bid is made unless it is a strong NT. A failure to announce the range will
not be considered a basis for an adjustment if there was a pre-alert.
Failure to announce the range as the bid is made leaves opponents in exactly
the same position as is currently the case.
Whether they pre-alert or not, a range announcement is still
necessary at the time of the bid.
The purpose of this change is to allow players to know the range of the NT
bid without having to ask questions or look at the card.Once a weak range has
been announced, you should know what your methods are and be able to react in
tempo. If your opponents have not learned these new methods, they may have
made a range announcement when they sat down but did not announce the range
of the weak No Trump as the bid was made.. That would be a good time to
gently explain the new procedure.
The main point of all this is for everyone to make a cooperative effort to
make the transition as smooth as possible. While we should always maintain a
friendly and helpful attitude, it is extremely important during this six
month grace period. This will be even more crucial in Club games. Players
are not going to be punished just because they were unfamiliar with these
changes. We are certainly not trying to create a new breed of "bridge
lawyers" who are trying to figure out how to get something for nothing.
Come to think of it, could it possibly hurt to maintain such an attitude at
all times?
By Alan LeBendig.
Converted to HTML by Jeff Goldsmith,
jeff@tintin.jpl.nasa.gov,
April 28, 1996